Souhlas a kdyby Pixel byl znovu otestován byla by tam podroboná recenze a ne jen tohle:
When the Google Pixel was launched in 2016, it was one of the top smartphone cameras we tested with the original DxOMark Mobile protocol in October 2016, thanks to its mixture of powerful hardware and innovative algorithms.The Pixel was also the first Google smartphone to drop the Nexus moniker of previous models and use the same Pixel branding as the company’s top-end Chromebooks and tablets. With a 1/2.3-inch 12MP sensor and f/2.0 aperture (but no optical image stabilization), the Pixel camera hardware specifications look identical to its predecessor, the Nexus 6P. However, Google has put a lot of effort into the software side of things, and thanks to more powerful processing and zero shutter lag, the company’s HDR+ mode, which uses multi-frame processing to reduce noise, capture better detail, and increase dynamic range, is now on by default. In addition, there is a new gyroscope-based video stabilization system for smoother panning and shake-free handheld video recording. Read on to find out how the Pixel performs under the updated DxOMark Mobile testing protocol.Please note that for this article we retested the Google Pixel with our updated DxOMark Mobile test protocol that includes tests for zoom and bokeh quality, among other improvements. You can still find our more comprehensive original Google Pixel review from September 2016 here. Key specifications:1/2.3” 12MP CMOS sensor with 1.55µm pixels
f/2.0 aperture
AF with on-sensor phase detection and laser assistance
Dual-tone LED flash
4K video at 30 fps
Gyroscope-based video stabilization
8MP front camera, 1/3.2″ sensor, 1.4 µm pixels, f/2.4, 1080p video
Test summary: Still one of the best
Almost a year after its launch, the Google Pixel remains one of the best smartphones for photography around. When tested with the new DxOMark Mobile protocol, it achieves the highest current score for dynamic range and is also still one of the best in terms of detail, color, and noise in all light conditions. However, the new testing methods have also revealed some artifact-related issues: the Pixel loses points for very strong flare, and maze and moiré artifacts are now also more visible in our more challenging updated test scenes.Given that the Pixel is a single-lens device, it is not a surprise that its poor digital zoom quality cannot compete with dual-cam equipped models such as the iPhone 7 Plus. And while the Pixel comes with an interesting bokeh feature that allows you to blur the background in portrait images by moving the phone slightly upwards during capture, the image results show strong artifacts — for example, uneven blur around the hair of portrait subjects.When shooting video, the Pixel is capable of capturing decent exposures down to very low light levels, but dynamic range is still limited. The latter is true for most of the Pixel’s competitors as well, though. Texture is good when compared to the competition and video stabilization works efficiently, but can create some artifacts when shooting indoors, such as noticeable differences in sharpness between frames.90 DxOMark MOBILE
Google Pixel
90 DxOMark MOBILE
PHOTO
Exposure & Contrast: 90
Color: 80
Autofocus: 98
Texture: 70
Noise: 65
Artifacts: 50
Flash: 81
Zoom: 24
Bokeh: 30
0
40
80
120
91 DxOMark MOBILE
VIDEO
Exposure & Contrast: 83
Color: 78
Autofocus: 94
Texture: 48
Noise: 75
Artifacts: 86
Stabilization: 89
0
40
80
120
ProsVery good highlight preservation
Very good detail in low light
Good noise levels in bright and medium light
Very fast, repeatable, and accurate autofocus
Well-balanced and well-exposed flash pictures
ProsGood exposure in almost all light conditions
Very good stabilization in most situations
Fast, smooth, and stable video autofocus
Good autofocus tracking
Good noise reduction and color at all light levels
Fast and smooth exposure transition
ConsStrong flare
Very low levels of detail for medium- and long-range zoom
Strong depth estimation artifacts in bokeh mode
Strong artifacts on moving subjects in bokeh mode
Strong moiré
Luminance noise in low light
ConsLack of dynamic range
Visible color shading in indoor conditions
Occasionally abrupt white balance transitions
Slight white balance inaccuracies in low light
Stabilization artifacts in indoor conditions (sharpness differences over consecutive frames)
Slightly too much noise indoors
Judder effect when panning
